Key Points
- Candace Owens escalates her public dispute with Turning Point USA, calling its flagship program “fake.”
- The feud stems from Owens promoting conspiracy theories surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death.
- Erika Kirk has publicly urged Owens to stop, prompting sharper criticism in response.
- Owens cites declining ratings for The Charlie Kirk Show and contrasts them with her own podcast’s growth.
- The conflict now extends beyond personal tensions, raising questions about influence and loyalty within conservative media.
Owens Targets TPUSA’s Flagship Show in Latest Salvo
Conservative commentator Candace Owens has intensified her ongoing feud with Turning Point USA, taking direct aim at the organization’s leading program, The Charlie Kirk Show. In her latest remarks, Owens labeled the show “fake,” escalating a dispute that has already drawn widespread attention across conservative media circles.
The clash centers on Owens’s continued promotion of conspiracy theories surrounding Charlie Kirk’s death, claims that TPUSA CEO Erika Kirk has repeatedly and publicly urged her to stop spreading.
Owens Points to Ratings Decline, Claims Her Own Growth
Owens defended her criticism by citing audience metrics. According to data referenced in Reuters coverage of the feud, The Charlie Kirk Show has seen a drop in viewership since Kirk’s death on September 10. Owens contrasted this with the reported growth of her own podcast, framing the dispute as a battle over authenticity and audience trust.
She argued that the current iteration of the show lacks the “spirit” of its late host. Because the program is produced under Resolute Media Group, TPUSA’s for‑profit media arm, Owens’s comments strike at the heart of the organization’s business operations — elevating the conflict from personal disagreement to institutional critique.
Erika Kirk’s Public Pleas Met With Sharper Pushback
The feud has taken on an increasingly personal tone. In a recent interview with CBS News journalist Bari Weiss, Erika Kirk directly addressed Owens, pleading with her to stop promoting conspiracy theories about her husband’s death.
Owens responded by accusing Weiss of “emotional manipulation,” signaling that she has no intention of backing down. Her remarks also referenced earlier comparisons she made between TPUSA and the Black Lives Matter movement — comments that further inflamed tensions.
Each public statement from Erika Kirk appears to prompt a stronger counterattack from Owens, transforming what began as a private dispute into a highly visible fracture within conservative media.
A Growing Divide With Uncertain Consequences
The long‑term implications of the feud remain unclear. Owens, an influential independent commentator, now finds herself in direct conflict with one of the most prominent conservative organizations in the country. The outcome may hinge on audience loyalty — a factor both sides appear keenly aware of.
What is certain is that the public clash over legacy, narrative control, and media influence shows no signs of slowing down.
What Happens Next?
As both sides continue to trade public statements, the feud is likely to intensify. TPUSA may face pressure to respond more formally, while Owens appears poised to continue leveraging her platform. The conservative media landscape — already fragmented — could see further division as audiences choose sides.
