Actor-singer Halle Bailey and rapper-YouTuber DDG have formally dropped the restraining orders they filed against each other earlier this year. According to court documents obtained by People, both parties submitted filings on October 27 in the Superior Court of Los Angeles, ending a five-month legal dispute. The documents confirm that each party reserves the right to reassert domestic violence claims in the future, and that the withdrawal cannot be used as evidence against either side.
The former couple, who share a son named Halo, also reached agreements on temporary custody and visitation.
Halle Bailey and DDG (Darryl Dwayne Granberry Jr.) withdrew mutual restraining orders on October 27, 2025, in Los Angeles Superior Court, following a five-month legal dispute stemming from allegations of abuse. Bailey’s original order was granted in May, while DDG filed his own in June. The decision to drop the orders was made mutually, with both parties agreeing to non-disparagement terms and a temporary custody schedule for their son.
Timeline and Custody Agreement
- Initial Orders: Bailey’s restraining order granted in May; DDG’s filed in June
- Withdrawal Date: October 27, 2025
- Custody Terms: DDG receives visitation rights on weekends and Wednesdays
- Holiday Schedule: Agreed upon but not publicly disclosed
- Non-Disparagement Clause: Both parties agreed not to speak negatively about each other publicly
- Child: Son named Halo, born December 2023
The filings state that either party may refile for protective orders if necessary.
Quotes and Reactions
From People court document excerpt:
“The parties each reserve her/his rights to resurrect any and all DV allegations.”
Legal analyst Dana Raines told Law360:
“This type of mutual withdrawal with protective clauses is common in high-profile cases involving shared custody.”
Fans on social media responded with mixed reactions:
“Hope they find peace for their son’s sake.” “Glad they’re keeping it civil.”
Public Image and Legal Precedent
The resolution marks a turning point in a publicly scrutinized relationship. Bailey and DDG’s decision to withdraw the orders and agree on custody terms may help stabilize their co-parenting dynamic. The inclusion of non-disparagement language suggests a desire to minimize public fallout and protect their son from media exposure.
The case also highlights the complexities of domestic legal disputes involving celebrities, where public perception and legal strategy often intersect.
What’s Next: Statements and Future Proceedings
- Public Statements: Neither party has issued a formal comment
- Court Monitoring: Custody terms may be revisited in future hearings
- Career Updates: Bailey continues promotion for The Little Mermaid sequel; DDG remains active on YouTube and in music
- Legal Rights: Both retain the ability to refile protective orders if needed
Further updates may follow pending any new filings or public disclosures.
